mahna mahna .net
Monday, 16 May 2005
Have you made up your mind on John Bolton, W's nominee to represent us at the United Nations? Even if you have, you won't believe this 90-second QuickTime video of Bolton first stating his view that "there is no United Nations" and then proceeding to go absolutely apeshit when someone (in this case, a very mild-mannered individual) has the audacity to politely disagree with him in a public forum.

This guy is both a moron and an ass. It will be a very sad thing if the Senate confirms him. There is no place in diplomacy for people who lose their cool and begin shouting when confronted with opposing ideas. Diplomacy is all about working with people when ideas clash. That's why we call it DIPLOMACY, dammit!

[spotted, oddly enough, at The Huffington Post]
posted to /politics at 16:48 :: 1 response
The important reviews are in. Roger Ebert gives Revenge of the Sith three and a half stars, and his review contains this non-spoiler gem:
Because the story leads up to where the original "Star Wars" began, we get to use the immemorial movie phrase, "This is where we came in."
Over in the New York Times, A.O. Scott also has praise for the film, including some interesting notes on the political message (!) it carries. And lastly, in the New Yorker, Anthony Lane does his typical routine of trying to impress you with a snarky and somewhat mean-spirited dismissal of the film. (Lane's work is and has long been that of a complete ass, and the only thing that saves film criticism in the New Yorker these days is that Lane shares his duties with David Denby, who actually writes intelligent, non-spoiler reviews that are often a joy to read.)

Me, I'm a bit embarrassed to admit I have tickets to the midnight showing of Sith when it opens this Thursday. I've never done a midnight premiere before, but this is the last Star Wars film ever (or perhaps not, as Ebert notes), and it seems clear that the mistakes of The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones — both of which I hated — have been left behind. Color me "very excited."
posted to /art/cinema at 12:02 :: 0 responses
Wednesday, 11 May 2005
The United States Senate passed a law yesterday that, for all intents and purposes, mandates a national ID card. If nothing else changes, you'll have a new driver's license in three years, and, as noted cryptography and security expert Bruce Schneier explains, this new card will make you less safe. (If you're not familiar with the issues he raises, his links are helpful.) The new cards will also, of course, cost your cash-strapped state a fortune.

This legislation was rammed through the Senate as an attachment to the latest military spending bill, which Senators just can't bring themselves to vote against, no matter what is attached. In fact, there wasn't even any debate held over the national ID card provisions. And the press? So far, they're turning this into the most underreported story of the year thus far. (And they wonder why people are quitting newspapers and the evening news...)
posted to /news at 11:33 :: 0 responses
/blog (449)
/art (35)
/books (5)
/cinema (13)
/music (13)
/life (97)
/bayarea (25)
/misc (119)
/items (20)
/news (78)
/politics (55)
/site (17)
/tech (40)
/wisdom (7)
Blosxom
Creative Commons
RSS
Atom


2008 (9)
May (2)
April (1)
March (1)
2007 (30)
July (3)
April (4)
March (2)
2006 (64)
August (1)
July (3)
June (1)
May (2)
March (4)
2005 (58)
August (5)
July (10)
May (3)
April (1)
March (10)
2004 (95)
August (11)
July (8)
June (12)
May (14)
April (11)
March (3)
2003 (193)
October (10)
August (21)
July (13)
June (19)
May (23)
April (23)
March (25)


my Amazon wish list